I was catching up on the gazillion blog posts piled up in my Google Reader this afternoon and came across something interesting in the comment thread to a post*. My understanding of the opinion expressed in the thread is that if Blogger A disagrees with something Blogger B wrote in a post, Blogger A must first express his/her disagreement in a comment on Blogger B's original post before Blogger A may write his/her own post on the issue.
Really? Is this a rule of blogging etiquette with which I'm completely unfamiliar? Cuz I'm about to disagree with another blogger and, you know, I wouldn't want to do it the wrong way!
The way I see it is that everything written on a public blog is fair game for other bloggers to link to and post about as they choose. I write all my posts with the realization that anyone who reads them may comment on them or write his/her own posts in response. These comments or posts may agree with me, disagree with me, extend the discussion further or in a different direction, or any combination of the above.
I don't expect other bloggers who write posts in response to mine to first ask for my permission or even to give me notice of what they are about to do. As long as they link to my post so I can go over and thank them for the link or defend myself, as the case may be, I'm cool with it.
This is not to say that I think bloggers should get in the habit of essentially flaming each other on their respective blogs. But if another blogger writes something that I disagree with, I may either say so in a comment or write a "rebuttal" post, depending on the nature of the disagreement, my relationship with that particular blogger, and the length of what I have to say.
So what do the rest of you think? If I'm thinking of writing a post disagreeing with something another blogger wrote, am I obligated to first leave a comment detailing the nature of my disagreement? If that blogger responds positively to my comment, am I no longer allowed to write my post? If my rebuttal is likely to be very long, is it sufficient to leave a comment giving notice of my intent to write a new post on the matter? Or can we just accept that we are sometimes going to disagree with each other and dispense with having to inform people with whom we disagree that we are about to disagree?
*I am not disclosing the blog post or the bloggers who wrote the specific comments so as not to be calling out specific bloggers. You'll just have to take my word for it that I'm not making this up!
What's left
38 minutes ago

